Most teachers would agree that video games are a great
motivator for student learning. However, most do not go further than this. It
is important, as teachers that we delve deeply into how video games can enhance
learning as well as consider what we can learn FROM them. Video games can teach
us ways to make learning experiences engaging as well as allowing students to
access ‘point in time’ meaningful knowledge building. The best way to get
involved with the video games phenomenon is to just jump in, but start small. I
have begun my journey by taking our Wii under the sea with year three.
The idea began while reading a journal article by Ben
Williamson from futurelab (access the article here), where they provided a
vignette of a teacher using Endless Ocean on the Wii to engage her lower
school students in the discovery of fish species. Later, while browsing Big W’s
discounted video games what should I come across but Endless Ocean 2:
Adventures of the deep at a very reasonable price. It was meant to be! For
those who are not familiar with Endless Ocean 2, it is a diving game that
allows players to swim around and discover various species of fish. This is
extended by allowing the player to click on the name of the fish, opening up a
window with information regarding the colour, length, general information and a
map of where the fish resides. There is also a story behind the game, so that
players can progress through the different stages.
This was my small step, using video games to help teach
students about fish species where knowledge was delivered at a logical point in
time. And it works! I expected arguments over who was going first, at least a
whinge of ‘why do I have to stop now?’ when a new fish was discovered, but no!
All of them were so engrossed in entering the information in their ‘dive logs’
that I didn’t hear a peep. Even the reluctant writers and ESL students were
powering along to the best of their ability. My next step will be to use the
information in their dive logs to do maths activities with statistics and data
representation. I am helping them make their learning explicit.
So what are the implications for my teaching practice? I
will not underestimate the power of video games to deliver learning in a way that
students understand. I can extrapolate from our experience with the Wii that
engaging tasks need to be interspersed with knowledge building at a logical
time for students to make sense of it. This does not just have to be related to
video games. It can help me develop learning experiences that have the elements
of ‘good games’ that allow students to extract the most out of the experience. James Paul Gee is an advocator of what we can learn from video games to
enhance our own practice. See my post
'Surmise the Possibilities' with James Paul Gee
to learn more about him and his beliefs surrounding video games and learning.
As a Teacher-Librarian, there are other implications for me
also. The role of the TL is evolving and it is often this person that
introduces new educational technology and practices to the teachers. We have a
responsibility to raise teacher’s awareness of what is available to them and
how it can be used to assist them. For some, raising awareness might be enough,
but others may need a whole lot more guidance and one-on-one interaction to
fully understand and implement new technologies in education. This impacts on
TLs as they need to be fully versed in educational technologies, such as video
games in order to fully educate the teachers involved. On top of this is the
resourcing component also. The TL needs to ensure that resources are available
for teachers to use video games in learning and close consultation with the
principal and IT technician or specialist is beneficial.
Not all teaching implications are positive, though. What are
some of the negative implications for teaching where video games are involved and
how can they be overcome? The first implication that comes to mind is ‘are we
spoiling children for the other types of learning that is required in the
classroom?’ It would be close to impossible, especially at this early stage to
create a full curriculum of learning based around video games (and some would
say, inadvisable). So, are teachers going to encounter difficulty when
presenting explicit instruction or facilitating rote learning? (we won’t get
into the pluses and minuses of this, just acknowledge that it occurs in
classrooms). Will students become difficult to teach and manage because the
teaching and learning is not living up to their expectations? Is this already occurring?
Based on their gaming experiences at home, are students already voicing and
acting out their displeasure with a type of learning they believe does not suit
their needs?
It is interesting the way you have managed to incorporate an every day gaming device successfully into the classroom. I must admit I was very surprised by your comment about the children not arguing or complaining over taking turns. Obviously the children were very appreciative of this learning experience and did not wish to risk having you withdraw such an enjoyable and valuable learning tool from the classroom. Naturally, throughout this semester I have read articles about using a Wii in the classroom but I have not actually seen or personally heard about a teacher successfully incorporating its use for educational practice, so BRAVO to you. Now that you have taken this small venture perhaps you will be able to convince other staff members of the educational benefits of a Wii or is it already used effectively at your school? I do know of some schools that have purchased the Wii systems however, the only manner in which they have been used is by the Physical Education teacher during wet weather. Such a shame when it could be used for so mush more as you can attest to. Just a query, were any parents questioning of you using the Wii for educating their children? And yes I have to agree I think we have to be careful not to produce a generation that expects everything to be taught to them in a fun and exciting manner because this also is not real-life.
ReplyDeleteComment by Deanna